🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". A law could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," said the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, support grew behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the state level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various politicians to follow the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this worldwide debate evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers indicate that states around the world are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.